The pathway map
The replacement mechanisms available for your ingredient, named and documented. The sweep starts from the whole catalogue.
When an ingredient is banned, restricted or out of supply, the search for substitutes stays limited to what the lab already knows and what suppliers offer. With Cosmap, it starts from the entire CosIng catalogue.
For a given case, Cosmap opens the available substitution pathways and, under each, the ingredients that follow them. Everything is justified and open to challenge. You then correct the analysis, or you explore.
Cyclotetrasiloxane (D4) is a silicone emollient long used everywhere, now restricted in Europe.
Here are the candidates Cosmap brings up, grouped by replacement strategy.
Saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, linear or branched. They reproduce the volatility of D4: they evaporate after application.
Branched ethers and diesters. They reproduce the slip and finish of D4 but stay on the skin: volatility is traded for persistence.
A pathway groups the candidates that replace the ingredient by the same mechanism.
Under each, they are ranked, and every line carries the reason for its presence and its regulatory status.
In the first pathway, one line does the opposite: Cosmap flags an ingredient its own grouping wrongly holds, and says why.
That is what open to challenge means.
The Cosmap engine justifies the substitution pathways and the candidate ranking by showing you the chemical characteristics it has retained: those to look for, and those to avoid.
It can be wrong. It may not have dug deep enough into a pathway or a family of ingredients.
From there, two moves:
You know things the engine does not: a process constraint, a family already ruled out internally, a criterion that does not apply to your product.
A pathway interests you, a family deserves digging into. The engine starts again on that ground and brings up the candidates the first pass did not retain.
Every iteration is kept, named and linked to the previous one. The trail stays available alongside the result.
Three fields are enough: the ingredient to replace, its function in the product, the product type.
An INCI name, a cosmetic function and a product category are public data.
Nothing entered belongs to your formulation.
The replacement mechanisms available for your ingredient, named and documented. The sweep starts from the whole catalogue.
Ranked, placed by family and subfamily, each with what justifies it.
Banned ingredients are ruled out before they are ever proposed.
The document that justifies the chosen option to an R&D director.
Cosmap does not reformulate for you. It does not predict performance in formula, tests nothing, and does not monitor your formulas over time.
It takes one ingredient and opens the pathways to replace it. The trials remain yours.
Faster screening. From an announced restriction to a list of argued candidates in minutes, instead of weeks of data gathering.
Better odds of success. Putting candidates into trial that the lab would not have listed on its own. The limiting factor is rarely the formulator's skill, it is the number of options they can realistically examine.
Every request is read and handled by hand. You will get a reply, and access when your case fits.
The demonstration and the first month of use are free. The steps that follow are set out after your request.